<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guitar Mic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cordernotes.com/blog/microphones/guitar-mic/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cordernotes.com/blog/blog/guitar-mic</link>
	<description>thoughts regarding art, music, and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 13:54:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.cordernotes.com/blog/blog/guitar-mic/comment-page-1#comment-1830</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 15:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cordernotes.com/blog/?p=957#comment-1830</guid>
		<description>Yeah,  1 on the Senn 906. I was really hesitant b/c I&#039;ve never liked the 609&#039;s but demo&#039;d it (in 409 mode) and fell in love. At it&#039;s price point, its tough to beat in sound quality and flexibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah,  1 on the Senn 906. I was really hesitant b/c I&#8217;ve never liked the 609&#8242;s but demo&#8217;d it (in 409 mode) and fell in love. At it&#8217;s price point, its tough to beat in sound quality and flexibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB Bowling</title>
		<link>http://www.cordernotes.com/blog/blog/guitar-mic/comment-page-1#comment-1682</link>
		<dc:creator>JB Bowling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 04:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cordernotes.com/blog/?p=957#comment-1682</guid>
		<description>An AKG 414 with the 10dB pad engaged sounds great!  Been using it for about 2 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An AKG 414 with the 10dB pad engaged sounds great!  Been using it for about 2 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Sessler</title>
		<link>http://www.cordernotes.com/blog/blog/guitar-mic/comment-page-1#comment-1681</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Sessler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cordernotes.com/blog/?p=957#comment-1681</guid>
		<description>We alternate between a Beta 57 and an e906 depending on which guitarist is playing. I&#039;ve also used a regular old 57 more than once. A few years ago, when I had one at my disposal, I used a Rode NT-3 with great results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We alternate between a Beta 57 and an e906 depending on which guitarist is playing. I&#8217;ve also used a regular old 57 more than once. A few years ago, when I had one at my disposal, I used a Rode NT-3 with great results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Cole</title>
		<link>http://www.cordernotes.com/blog/blog/guitar-mic/comment-page-1#comment-1631</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 03:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cordernotes.com/blog/?p=957#comment-1631</guid>
		<description>I like the Senn 906 as well.  The Royer ribbon mic works great too.  Can&#039;t remember the model number.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the Senn 906 as well.  The Royer ribbon mic works great too.  Can&#8217;t remember the model number.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cliff skinner</title>
		<link>http://www.cordernotes.com/blog/blog/guitar-mic/comment-page-1#comment-1630</link>
		<dc:creator>cliff skinner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 03:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cordernotes.com/blog/?p=957#comment-1630</guid>
		<description>I tweeted this to you as well.
but this is more detailed:

I just got off a tour using a KSM-32 and i5 combo on my half stacks (I work for Kutless. so more of a rock sound). and depending on the music I&#039;ll go with a 609 on it&#039;s own (I cue it in my cue pack and move mic till I find right placement). I don&#039;t mind the i5 on it&#039;s own either. but I always try to pair it with either a 57, 609 or KSM-32 (I own the 32&#039;s personally. but only take them on tour. I don&#039;t want to fly with them)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tweeted this to you as well.<br />
but this is more detailed:</p>
<p>I just got off a tour using a KSM-32 and i5 combo on my half stacks (I work for Kutless. so more of a rock sound). and depending on the music I&#8217;ll go with a 609 on it&#8217;s own (I cue it in my cue pack and move mic till I find right placement). I don&#8217;t mind the i5 on it&#8217;s own either. but I always try to pair it with either a 57, 609 or KSM-32 (I own the 32&#8242;s personally. but only take them on tour. I don&#8217;t want to fly with them)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timcorder</title>
		<link>http://www.cordernotes.com/blog/blog/guitar-mic/comment-page-1#comment-1629</link>
		<dc:creator>timcorder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cordernotes.com/blog/?p=957#comment-1629</guid>
		<description>Some additional Twitter input...

1.  Palmer DI matched up with mics (going to have to check into this!  A Palmer is pretty inexpensive and this isn&#039;t the first I&#039;ve heard of this)
2.  57s (lr) and 421 (c)
3.  Shure SM7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some additional Twitter input&#8230;</p>
<p>1.  Palmer DI matched up with mics (going to have to check into this!  A Palmer is pretty inexpensive and this isn&#8217;t the first I&#8217;ve heard of this)<br />
2.  57s (lr) and 421 (c)<br />
3.  Shure SM7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timcorder</title>
		<link>http://www.cordernotes.com/blog/blog/guitar-mic/comment-page-1#comment-1625</link>
		<dc:creator>timcorder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cordernotes.com/blog/?p=957#comment-1625</guid>
		<description>I just demo&#039;d a vintage 409 this weekend and loved it A LOT more than a 609.  No comparison in fact.  The 609 sounds so harsh and thin compared to a 409...its hard to believe the 609 is supposed to be its replacement.  Interested to compare the 409 &amp; 906 next week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just demo&#8217;d a vintage 409 this weekend and loved it A LOT more than a 609.  No comparison in fact.  The 609 sounds so harsh and thin compared to a 409&#8230;its hard to believe the 609 is supposed to be its replacement.  Interested to compare the 409 &#038; 906 next week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.cordernotes.com/blog/blog/guitar-mic/comment-page-1#comment-1622</link>
		<dc:creator>C Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cordernotes.com/blog/?p=957#comment-1622</guid>
		<description>AE2500&#039;s work well. the dual element design gives you some cool tone balancing options in a single mic.
i also love sennheiser e906 and of course a RE20 is always interesting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AE2500&#8242;s work well. the dual element design gives you some cool tone balancing options in a single mic.<br />
i also love sennheiser e906 and of course a RE20 is always interesting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stevenbruce</title>
		<link>http://www.cordernotes.com/blog/blog/guitar-mic/comment-page-1#comment-1606</link>
		<dc:creator>stevenbruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 18:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cordernotes.com/blog/?p=957#comment-1606</guid>
		<description>Wait...there are other mics you can use on electric guitar ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait&#8230;there are other mics you can use on electric guitar <img src='http://www.cordernotes.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh collesano</title>
		<link>http://www.cordernotes.com/blog/blog/guitar-mic/comment-page-1#comment-1605</link>
		<dc:creator>josh collesano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 16:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cordernotes.com/blog/?p=957#comment-1605</guid>
		<description>right now we&#039;re using Sennheiser 409&#039;s inside our iso-cabs for our student ministries Electric Guitarists. My weapon of choice personally is still an SM 57.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>right now we&#8217;re using Sennheiser 409&#8242;s inside our iso-cabs for our student ministries Electric Guitarists. My weapon of choice personally is still an SM 57.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.cordernotes.com/blog/blog/guitar-mic/comment-page-1#comment-1604</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 16:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cordernotes.com/blog/?p=957#comment-1604</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m using a at4040 on both of my electrics   thinking about adding a 57 with it  both amps are in a iso cab off stage</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m using a at4040 on both of my electrics   thinking about adding a 57 with it  both amps are in a iso cab off stage</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

