Archive for February, 2007
Zoning the Stage

For the past 10 years or so, there has been a gradual shift in snake system designs and layouts with the advent of stage zoning. Most concert snakes currently in use offer a snake “head” with anywhere from 40 to 60 channels as well as monitor and front of house (FOH) trunks.
Runs are typically 50 feet to the monitor desk and 200 to 300 feet to FOH. Cable trunks are for the most part connected to the stage head using a quick-disconnect multi-pin, with the same at the XLR fan-out.
But snake systems have evolved, with stages divided into a series of zones that are connected to the snake head via sub-snakes and multi-pin connectors. For instance, one zone may be for keyboards, one may be at the drum kit, one for the back-line ‘stage left’ and the other back-line ‘stage right’.
An interesting example of this was the recent Celine Dion world tour: Montreal sound company Solotech took zoning a huge step further by providing individual snakes and multipin connectors to each musician’s rack.
This included a sub-snake for each guitarist, bass player, keyboards; in fact, dozens of sub-snakes routed throughout the stage.
Sound extreme? It may be impractical for regional touring, where specific systems cannot be configured for a particular band, but the advantages of zoning the stage are many. Intricate stage set-ups can be done in half the time.
Sub-snake configurations typically vary between six and 20 channels, with the most popular number being 12 channels. This is mostly due to the fact that 37-pin multi-connectors are widely available (XLR 3 pins x 12 = 36, plus one spare), as is 12-channel snake cable (also used in 8 by 4 snakes). Because most snakes tend to be 48 to 52 channels, 12 channels makes dividing the stage into four zones relatively easy.
Implementing sub-snakes is going to be a priority for me in cleaning up our stage and making setup simpler and more organized.
Dual ICON Consoles used for Grammy’s Broadcast
This is interesting…
At this year’s 49th annual Grammy Awards telecast, sound engineers utilized a groundbreaking workflow, incorporating dual Digidesign® ICON systems to produce live mixes for all performing artists. From the XM/Effanel L7 mobile production trailer, XM/Effanel’s team of engineers delivered simultaneous real-time 5.1 surround and 2-channel audio mixes for every artist who performed on stage.
In addition to the XM/Effanel system, the Grammys employed a second mobile ICON system which was configured to mirror the ICON system in the L7 trailer. Both mobile production trailers housed a 32-fader ICON D-Control™ worksurface along with a powerful Pro Tools|HD® 7 Accel system for recording and mixing. By recording the rehearsals on one system, and then moving the session to the secondary system for further refinement while the next artist was rehearsing, engineers John Harris and Eric Shilling were able to achieve better mixes than ever before.
“Every year the Grammy broadcast becomes more complex,” says Hank Neuberger, co-broadcast audio supervisor. “By relying on the power and flexibility of dual ICON systems, we were able to develop a unique workflow. We captured more pre-mix time for our music mixers to create the very best balances. The performing artists and their producers had more opportunities to collaborate with our music mixers, and that resulted in a better sounding show.”
Neuberger concluded, “What we were doing was stretching the space-time continuum and creating rehearsal hours that we never had before. The result is the most polished mixes ever!”
XM/Effanel has a successful track record for mixing with ICON systems, including projects for Jazz at Lincoln Center and the Video Music Awards. For more information about XM/Effanel Music, visit http://www.effanel.com.
Our Input List
Although this is somewhat fluid, here’s the default input list for weekend and midweek services at KCC.
Stereo wedge mixes
Stereo Stage Mixes: Pro and Con
By Dan Laveglia
Try It, You’ll Like It…Maybe
For a long time I wondered about mixing wedges in stereo. I was sure it would sound good, so recently I took the plunge and set up a pair of loudspeakers to see what it was all about.
For about a week I tried different things to see what I could find out. During the afternoons on show days I listened to various instruments and vocal mics. In many ways the sound was better than listening in mono. Particularly when a stereo reverb was applied to a vocal mic, or listening to the grand piano. (We have a seven-foot Steinway with three Barcus Berry Planar Wave pickups to choose from.) I continued to monitor during the shows, using my cue wedges in stereo and setting up a mix with EQ’s for myself with real musicians playing real instruments during the performance.
It was really no surprise that this set up was more pleasing to the ears, but was it actually a better stage-monitoring configuration?
All Things Being Equal
What I learned initially was that the equalizers being used must be set precisely in order to keep things where you place them in the stereo mix. I suggest using a stereo unit that tracks both channels with one adjustment if you must go here. The wedges (including their crossovers and power amplifiers) must be well matched too so that you have very consistent performance from both the left and right loudspeakers. This is essential for controlling the stereo field you are trying to create.
Differences in the frequency response between channels in this type of configuration will cause things to shift location in different ways within the field. For example, if you assigned the high hat to your stereo wedges, with the pan slightly to the left, but the speaker on the left was deficient in reproducing the main frequencies contained in this sound (compared to the right speaker), the apparent location of this source when you listened would not be where the pan pot indicated!
While this in itself may not seem too large a hurdle, consider an instrument that reproduces a wide range of frequencies like an acoustic guitar. While it might sound “spacious” being played as a rhythm instrument by itself, I don’t think you really want the guitar to pan from one side to the other as the player picks a lead break playing up or down a scale of notes. (Or maybe you do?)
The addition of more instruments and more deviations at other frequencies soon presents the listener with an auditory mess. Remember, we are trying to accurately monitor audio on a stage in a live acoustic environment.
Sometimes You Do and Sometimes…
Assuming that you have been successful in setting up and tuning your stereo wedges so that the spectral shift is not an issue, this configuration can present good results in some applications. Many keyboard players gain advantage in being able to hear what their rigs are doing in stereo. Even a guitar player with a true stereo set-up may like to hear exactly what he is sending to FOH. Good players will use the stereo mix as a tool to make them even better. But these examples are different. They are for monitoring a stereo instrument with an appropriate playback system, not trying to place mono instruments in a stereo field.
Yes, it is possible to get a great stereo sound and a great mix going with the right console and some good loudspeakers. Guys do it at FOH all the time, right? But as I mentioned above, we are trying to create an environment on the stage where it is easy for the band to hear what they want to hear. Do you really want to create phantom images of instruments and voices in an area between two loudspeakers to make it easier for the musicians to hear? In most cases I don’t think so.
However…
With that said I would like to add that with the right musicians, under the right circumstances, good results are certainly possible. But it will require a musician who understands what he is listening to, and a willingness to experiment to achieve the desired results. (It won’t be something you just stumble on and it’s right.) As for a one-off with a band you’ve never heard…. I won’t be trying it.
In Your Space… or In Your Face
When all of the experimenting was done, when it was actually show time, I made one simple observation that decided it all for me. Yes, stereo instruments sounded better and effects were wonderful…but you know that sound when you are listening to stereo program on your headphones and then you hit the mono switch? BAM… all of a sudden the image is right in the middle of you head, and oh so balanced between your ears. Well, I observe the same phenomena with two wedges in mono. With the loudspeakers placed properly in front of the musician, a mono mix puts the sound (particularly your own vocal) right in your face! And if the object is for the musician to easily hear what he wants in his mix, especially in a difficult environment… I’m going to mix audio the old fashioned way.
Microphone Placement Technique for Theatre


So you want to know how to attach a microphone to an actors head, and make it invisible? Where are the mics? It seems to be the most frequently asked question, next to could you turn it down, or could you turn it up. Here’s a little guide that may help you understand how mic rigs are built and used.
http://www.brightandloud.com/microphone-placement
This is one of the best practical articles I’ve ever seen on this topic. Along the way, I’ve found a really cool industry magazine if you have to work with actors, theater, and such called Stage Directions. The site for subscriptions is down in my links